Oracle Training Oracle Support Development Oracle Apps

 E-mail Us
 Oracle Articles
New Oracle Articles

 Oracle Training
 Oracle Tips

 Oracle Forum
 Class Catalog

 Remote DBA
 Oracle Tuning
 Emergency 911
 RAC Support
 Apps Support
 Oracle Support

 SQL Tuning

 Oracle UNIX
 Oracle Linux
 Remote s
 Remote plans
 Application Server

 Oracle Forms
 Oracle Portal
 App Upgrades
 SQL Server
 Oracle Concepts
 Software Support

 Remote S


 Consulting Staff
 Consulting Prices
 Help Wanted!


 Oracle Posters
 Oracle Books

 Oracle Scripts

Don Burleson Blog 








New web law
Man residing in the USA was extradited and tried for web site content

According to the New York Sun, this fellow was arrested, extradited and sent to a foreign country, where he was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison for "inciting racial hatred".  This included his online web publications, most notably his publications on a Holocaust Denial web site.  The story notes that his worldwide publishing caught the attention of several countries and crossed many national jurisdictions:

"For over a decade, Mr. ZŁndel has become a primary contributor to one of the main Holocaust-denial Web sites,, Ms. Krenz said.

Ms. Krenz said Mr. ZŁndel had moved to Tennessee with his wife in 2001, only to be arrested by immigration authorities and extradited to Canada two years later. The Canadian authorities, who had long wanted to prosecute Mr. ZŁndel, in turn submitted him to their German counterparts in 2005."

In this case, the man published offensive documents such as "The Hitler we loved, and why", yet even though he was residing in Tennessee, he not not enjoy America's free speech, and is facing a foreign prison for expressing his opinions.  The story says that he was apprehended by the US Immigration department, he may not have been legally residing in the United States.

In the USA, you cannot be punished for defaming the dead, under the legal assumption that no libel can exist against a dead person.  However, it appears that in Germany it's a serious offense to dishonor "the memory" of the deceased.  For example, a German historian who claimed that Auschwitz prisoners enjoyed cinemas, a swimming pool and brothels was sentenced to 10 months in jail.

Germany has exercised their right to extradite anyone who published a web site that can be seen in Germany, regardless of where the author is residing.

In Germany and Austria, it's a crime to deny the Holocaust, even if you are living in America.  Germany does not agree with what Voltaire said "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it".

Be warned if your blog is accessible in countries without free speech

This extradition and conviction has huge ramifications for anyone who publishes anything on the Internet, even if it's just a chatty blog or posting in a chat room.  Anyone who writes on the web is now required to follow the laws of every country from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe, anywhere that your web page might be accessible.  For example, the Australian courts have rules that any web page accessible in Australia subjects the author to the jurisdictions of the Australian courts. 

Dubbed "thought crime", many foreign courts are now reaching out to offensive Internet web sites across the globe, trying to extradite people to foreign lands to face prison.

In the USA we protect our First Amendment rights to Free Speech, and even offensive and hateful opinions are legally protected. 

However, even in the USA there are limits to free speech, especially when it defames or libels a person or group, and you cannot scream "fire" in a crowded theater.

The worldwide legal landscape

Let this be a warning to all bloggers and chat room participants that you may find yourself being extradited to a foreign land to face charges that are covered under the US right to free speech.

Even the act of linking to illegal or libelous content can get you arrested, as hyperlinking is considered "advertising" and repeating the onerous content.

 For example, in Australia, it appears that defamation and libel laws are so strict that they can become criminal offenses, and Australians can haul the authors of defamatory publications into Australian courts for publishing defamatory comments anywhere in the world.

In South Australia, Victoria and the Northern Territory under common law any libel of sufficient seriousness can lead to criminal proceedings.

In a landmark case, Australia's highest court on Tuesday gave a businessman the right to sue for defamation in Australia over an article published in the United States and posted on the Internet.

Let this be a lesson to anyone who write comments on the web that our cherished freedom of speech has limits and that the long arm of the law can reach across the globe.

US limits to free speech

Even within the USA, your blog or web page might cause you to get arrested.    This is especially true with regard to false publications so inflammatory that they would incite a reasonable person to committing illegal acts.  In these cases below, the Defendants published lies that were so offensive that the publishers could reasonably forecast harassment, threats and intimidation to result from their publications.  (see Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942), Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315 (1951), Cox v. Louisiana, 377 U.S. 288 (1965)).

We must remember that the "right to your own opinion" has Constitutional limits and those who defame others cannot drape themselves in the First Amendment and prevail: (see Boyce v. Wake County)

"The use of a known lie as a tool is at once at odds with the premises of democratic government and with the orderly manner in which economic, social, or political change is to be effected.

Hence the knowingly false statement and the false statement made with reckless disregard of the truth, do not enjoy constitutional protection."

The US Courts have the right to restrict speech if the speech constitutes "Fighting Words". Fighting Words means speech usually intended to be a personal insult and directed to a specific person, which by their very utterance inflict injury and tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.

"Fighting Words" are not considered free speech, and they are not protected under the First Amendment because their slight social value is outweighed by the government's compelling interest in social order. (see Supreme court decisions 315 U.S. 568, 403 U.S. 15, 340 U.S. 315, and 377 U.S. 288).


Oracle Training at Sea
oracle dba poster

Follow us on Twitter 
Oracle performance tuning software 
Oracle Linux poster


Burleson is the American Team

Note: This Oracle documentation was created as a support and Oracle training reference for use by our DBA performance tuning consulting professionals.  Feel free to ask questions on our Oracle forum.

Verify experience! Anyone considering using the services of an Oracle support expert should independently investigate their credentials and experience, and not rely on advertisements and self-proclaimed expertise. All legitimate Oracle experts publish their Oracle qualifications.

Errata?  Oracle technology is changing and we strive to update our BC Oracle support information.  If you find an error or have a suggestion for improving our content, we would appreciate your feedback.  Just  e-mail:  

and include the URL for the page.


Burleson Consulting

The Oracle of Database Support

Oracle Performance Tuning

Remote DBA Services


Copyright © 1996 -  2017

All rights reserved by Burleson

Oracle ® is the registered trademark of Oracle Corporation.

Remote Emergency Support provided by Conversational