Oracle Training Oracle Support Development Oracle Apps

 
 Home
 E-mail Us
 Oracle Articles
New Oracle Articles


 Oracle Training
 Oracle Tips

 Oracle Forum
 Class Catalog


 Remote DBA
 Oracle Tuning
 Emergency 911
 RAC Support
 Apps Support
 Analysis
 Design
 Implementation
 Oracle Support


 SQL Tuning
 Security

 Oracle UNIX
 Oracle Linux
 Monitoring
 Remote s
upport
 Remote plans
 Remote
services
 Application Server

 Applications
 Oracle Forms
 Oracle Portal
 App Upgrades
 SQL Server
 Oracle Concepts
 Software Support

 Remote S
upport  
 Development  

 Implementation


 Consulting Staff
 Consulting Prices
 Help Wanted!

 


 Oracle Posters
 Oracle Books

 Oracle Scripts
 Ion
 Excel-DB  

Don Burleson Blog 


 

 

 


 

 

 

 

Web prankster publishes personal sex details

This article talks about a sick web prank on Craiglist, where Jason Fortuny posted an entrapment (a fake sex ad) and then published the personal details (and in some cases, nude photo's) of those who responded via e-mail.

"If a really malicious person wanted to get on craigslist and ruin a lot of people's lives, he easily could. . .

He wrote, "178 responses, with 145 photos of men in various states of undress. Responses include full e-mail addresses (both personal and business addresses), names, and in some cases IM screen names and telephone numbers."

In a staggering move, he then published every single response, unedited and uncensored, with all photos and personal information to Encyclopedia Dramatica (kinda like Wikipedia for web fads and Internet drama). Read the responses (warning: sexually explicit material).""

Many folks are saying that Mr. Fortuny is mean and evil, but it appears that what he did is not a crime.

Sadly, low-income losers (without assets to take in a civil lawsuit) have free reign to ruin the reputations of private citizens without fear of jail time.

We all remember the famous 20/20 TV show where child molester were entrapped using the web, and the TV show had no qualm's exposing the personal details of the pervs because it is in the "public interest". 

Invasion of Privacy?

In this case, the article alleges that some of the respondents were married and seeking an adulterous relationship, but the central question is whether it's in the public interest to expose adulterers?

Many States have laws against invasion of privacy, and in some places you can be sued for disclosing embarrassing facts about someone, even if they are true.

In False Light Invasion of Privacy, A New Tort in Town, judges Breeeden and Zayicek note that the the right to privacy is protected in many States:

"the wrongful intrusion into one’s private activities, in such manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame, or humiliation to a person of ordinary sensibilities."

They also note that the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed that publishing embarrassing facts about a private citizen (even if the statements of fact are completely true):

This (U.S. Supreme) Court has approved the following as a fairly comprehensive definition of what constitutes an actionable invasion of the right of privacy:

The unwarranted appropriation or exploitation of one’s personality, the publicizing of one’s private affairs with which the public has no legitimate concern, or the wrongful intrusion into one’s private activities, in such manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame, or humiliation to a person of ordinary sensibilities.

In some cases, bloggers who embarrass people have been levied with hefty damages "The Pensacola News Journal was ordered to pay a $18.28 million jury verdict for actual harm to a businessman by casting him in a "false light."

"People who use blogs and message boards are publishing statements in a public forum and the same rules apply as they would if these statements were published in a newspaper.

"If a statement is likely to provoke hatred, ridicule or contempt, and the blogger is not able to prove that it is either true or a fair comment based on fact, then a libel has been committed."

South Carolina has strict laws against invasion of privacy.  In the publication "THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY vs. THE FIRST AMENDMENT" (1978), author  Alice Marie Beard notes that in many States it is illegal to intrude upon someone's seclusion or solitude, to publicly disclose embarrassing private facts about someone; or to generate publicity that places the someone in a "false light" in the public eye.

It ought to be a crime?

It appears that Mr. Fortuny is in a heap-o-trouble from lawsuits, but it he has as much money as he has ethics, it's likely that he is judgment proof.  As the old country lawyer one said "You cannot get blood from a turnip".

The really scary part is that anyone who is judgment proof (without assets) has free rein to disclose private facts and ruin the reputation of private citizens.



 

 
 
��  
 
 
Oracle Training at Sea
 
 
 
 
oracle dba poster
 

 
Follow us on Twitter 
 
Oracle performance tuning software 
 
Oracle Linux poster
 
 
 

 

Burleson is the American Team

Note: This Oracle documentation was created as a support and Oracle training reference for use by our DBA performance tuning consulting professionals.  Feel free to ask questions on our Oracle forum.

Verify experience! Anyone considering using the services of an Oracle support expert should independently investigate their credentials and experience, and not rely on advertisements and self-proclaimed expertise. All legitimate Oracle experts publish their Oracle qualifications.

Errata?  Oracle technology is changing and we strive to update our BC Oracle support information.  If you find an error or have a suggestion for improving our content, we would appreciate your feedback.  Just  e-mail:  

and include the URL for the page.


                    









Burleson Consulting

The Oracle of Database Support

Oracle Performance Tuning

Remote DBA Services


 

Copyright © 1996 -  2017

All rights reserved by Burleson

Oracle ® is the registered trademark of Oracle Corporation.

Remote Emergency Support provided by Conversational